WebAIM Screen Reader Survey

Many of you know WebAIM (Web Accessibility in Mind) as one of the most complete and best maintained sources of good information on accessible design topics. In December and January, WebAIM conducted a survey of preferences of screen reader users relating to Web design and Web technologies. The survey collected 1121 responses from people with various disabilities. See WebAIM: Screen Reader Survey Results I found the results to be quite useful:

• Headings really are important: "It is clear that providing a heading structure is important to screen reader users with 76% always or often navigating by headings when they are available." 90% of the expert users used headings always or often.
• Site maps were not particularly useful: "The majority of respondents seldom or never use site maps."
• Pop-up windows are difficult for less proficient screen readers to deal with. More proficient users had much less difficulty.
• Photos should be identified as such in their alt text, rather than just described with brief text: "It was very clear that the vast majority of screen reader users prefer to have photos identified as such. Interestingly, those that do not have a disability were three times more likely to prefer the briefer alt text than those that do have a disability."
• Flash is difficult for screen reader users: "71.5% of screen reader users reported that Flash is difficult while only 14.2% reported that it is easy."
• Frames are not that big of a problem. "While the majority (58%) of users reported that frames are easy, those that are blind were 3 1/2 times more likely to indicate that they are easy than those with no disability."

Clearly, Web accessibility evaluator's rules of thumb (i.e., Frames are not accessible) can be simplistic or misleading . I encourage everyone to read through these results carefully. And I would like to send a hearty thanks to WebAIM for conducting the survey!

First Access Hack Session

For our first Access Hack Session, Dylan Wilbanks of the School of Public Health gave us a tour of their site, explaining its design and accessibility features. A lively discussion followed about the methods used, issues they raise, and other methods the Dylan might want to explore for the next site update. Detail discussion minutes are available.Take a look at the site, review the minutes, and add your thoughts.